Howes Percival
About us Insights Events Contact Careers Client Login
People When it’s up to us it’s all about you
Insights Image
Services
View all
Services
View all Academies and Conversions Agriculture and Estates Banking & Finance Charity Church Law Commercial Commercial Property Company Secretarial Services Construction Contentious Trusts & Probate Corporate Dispute Resolution and Litigation Employment and HR Employment for individuals Employment Law Training Employment Tribunal Claims Environmental Law Family Services Fraud Recovery GDPR Health and Safety Law Immigration In-House Lawyers Insolvency and Corporate Recovery Intellectual Property International Business and Trading Overseas IT and Digital Commerce Licensing Planning Property Dispute Resolution Property Investment Regulation and Compliance Residential Conveyancing Social Housing Wills, Probate, Tax and Trusts
Howes Percival Sector Grass
Sectors
Read More
Sectors
View all Automotive Agriculture Development and Construction Food and Beverage Government and Public Sector Health & Social Care Leisure and Tourism Technology and Innovation
UK Countryside
Locations
View More
Locations
View all Cambridge Leicester Manchester Milton Keynes Norwich Northampton Oxford
Whistleblowing - Man and Woman
Back

Reasonable belief that a disclosure is made in the public interest is sufficient

5th September, 2019

In Okwu v Rise Community Action the EAT has emphasised the importance of employment tribunals considering whether an employee reasonably believes their protected disclosure was made in the public interest, when determining whistleblowing claims.

Miss Okwu worked for Rise Community Action, a small charity providing support for individuals affected by domestic violence amongst other issues. Having raised numerous issues regarding Miss Okwu’s performance, Rise extended her probation period by three months. After that Miss Okwu raised concerns about Rise acting in breach of the Data Protection Act by failing to provide her with her own mobile phone and secure storage facilities. Miss Okwu was dealing with sensitive and confidential personal information which she believed was not adequately protected. Subsequently, Miss Okwu’s employment was terminated on performance grounds; she then brought tribunal proceedings claiming that she had been unfairly dismissed for making protected disclosures.

The tribunal dismissed Miss Okwu claim, finding that the matters raised by Miss Okwu were not in the public interest but concerned her own contractual position. In particular, the tribunal found the concerns raised about potential breaches of the Data Protection Act were done so in connection with Miss Okwu’s performance issues.

The EAT found the tribunal’s approach to be incorrect, as it had failed to explore with Miss Okwu the extent to which she had a reasonable belief that her disclosure (relating to potential breaches of the Data Protection Act) was in the public interest. Given the sensitive information involved, the EAT found it improbable that she did not have a reasonable belief that her disclosures were in the public interest.

Simon deMaid comments: 

“Whistleblowing claims are technical and complicated. Whilst this case does not create any new principles of law, it is a useful reminder of the fact that claimants need only have a reasonable belief that their disclosure is made in the public interest. If you need assistance with similar issues contact the team here”.

Life more sure
Locations
Cambridge Solicitors Leicester Solicitors Milton Keynes Solicitors Manchester Solicitors Northampton Solicitors Norwich Solicitors Oxford Solicitors
Sectors
Agriculture Automotive Development Food and Beverage Healthcare Leisure and Tourism Technology and Innovation
Resources
Articles Case Studies Resources Video Gallery Newsletter Pay my invoice
Awards
Social
© 2025 Howes Percival | All Rights Reserved
Equality & Diversity | Privacy Policy | Legal & Regulatory (including Complaints) | Cookies Policy | Carbon Reduction Plan | Accessibility |